Friday 27th October 2023
The Lumma Information Stealer, also known as Lumma Stealer or LummaC2, is a type of Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS) that has been advertised and sold on numerous dark web forums since 2022.
Lumma Stealer specialises in gathering and exfiltrating sensitive data, such as login credentials and bank details, from affected devices. It primarily targets cryptocurrency wallets, browser extensions, and two-factor authentication (2FA), before ultimately stealing sensitive information from compromised machines. The malware has been observed being distributed through drive-by-downloads, masquerading as browser updates, and through deceptive sites offering game downloads and software cracks.
It can obtain system and installed program data from compromised devices, alongside sensitive information such as cookies, usernames and passwords, credit card numbers, connection history, and cryptocurrency wallet data.
Lumma is known to target Windows operating systems from Windows 7 to 11 and at least 10 different browsers including Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Mozilla Firefox. It has also been observed targeting crypto wallets like Binance and Ethereum, as well as crypto wallet and 2FA browser extensions like Metamask and Authenticator respectively. Data from applications such as AnyDesk or KeePass can also be exfiltrated by the malware.
Lumma Information Stealer has been an emerging threat since early 2023, joining the list of info stealers that have been on the rise, including Vidar and Racoon. It was developed by a threat actor known as “Shamel”, under the alias "Lumma" and has been sold in underground (dark web) forums since December 2022. The number of sightings of this malware being distributed on dark web forums is on the rise, and thus far, more than a dozen command-and-control (C2) servers have been observed in the wild. Between January and April 2023, multiple instances of Lumma stealer activity were observed and investigated across the customer base.
The Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS) model continues to provide would-be threat actors with an inexpensive and relatively straightforward way to carry out sophisticated cyber-attacks. There has been an increase in the popularity and usage of information stealing malware in underground markets and it is highly likely this is a trend which will continue over the next 6 months. It is almost certain the malware will continue to become more damaging, and that it’s stealing capabilities, simple administration, execution and above all, ability to remain undetected will ensure that its popularity continues. It is also likely that users with limited technical knowledge will continue to use it, as evidenced by threat actors offering subscription-based access, rather than the usual single payment methodology. There is a realistic possibility that, depending on the sensitivity of the stolen data, cyber criminals could potentially use it for blackmail purposes and demand a ransom under threat of publication. Likewise, criminals can abuse communication/social platforms to steal the victim's identity and ask their contacts/friends for loans, which can also be used to spread the malware (by sharing malicious files/links). Finance-related accounts will almost certainly be used to make fraudulent transactions or online purchases.
This is based on current, limited knowledge, which should be further investigated and checked, before being applied to your systems.
The Probability Yardstick
To quantify language, we use the Probability Yardstick, from the Professional Head of Intelligence Assessment. It is a tool used by the UK Government to standardise the way we describe probability and has been used to ensure consistency across the different thematic areas and threats when providing assessments on how likely something is to occur. The yardstick is included for clarity.
We also assess our sources using the below matrix, but rarely disclose our source, to protect the integrity of the source. We assess sources on how reliable they are, how they accessed the intelligence, and we then decide if this intelligence can be shared. The table shown to the illustrates this.
High confidence generally indicates judgements based on high-quality information, and/or the nature of the issue makes it possible to render a solid judgment. A “high confidence” judgment is not a fact or a certainty, however, and still carries a risk of being wrong.
Moderate confidence generally means credibly sourced and plausible information, but not of sufficient quality or corroboration to warrant a higher level of confidence
Low confidence generally means questionable or implausible information was used, the information is too fragmented or poorly corroborated to make solid analytic inferences, or significant concerns or problems with sources existed
If you have any questions relating to the above, please reach out to your dedicated Bytes Account Manager, or email [email protected].
Want to keep informed? Sign up to our Newsletter